Met Models

Met Models is similar to its sister site, Met-Art, in both style and content. The difference between the 2 sites isn't all that obvious. Upon further investigation, I noticed that the rate at which new content is added was different and that tags, models bios and advanced rating options were missing on Met Models. The good part is that the site is more affordable.

The girls of Met Models are beautiful and classy. Some of them do appear to be slightly more "amateurish" than those featured on Met-Art. Then again, it takes a keen eye to notice the difference (if any), as some models are featured on both sites.

Most content features girls slowly undressing and posing, or soft lesbian scenes. Spread shots and close-ups are fairly common but it all remains classy and erotic. There's a good amount of outdoor shoots.

Photography is excellent overall, but members should expect a bit of variation in style and quality from one photographer to another. There's usually good variety from one photo set to another and throughout the sets as well. Photo sets are available for download in 3 different sizes (zip files).

Since the last video update happened over 2 years ago, I guess it's safe to say that Met Models is a photography-only site. This isn't a bad thing since they do the photography part pretty well.

Navigation is Met Models is easy and intuitive, with most of its features inherited from Met Art. The design itself is a bit plain, but the focus is on the content and everything is where it should be and that's what really matters. The search engine is helpful, but I wish more search options were added. Members can rate and add series to their own on-site favorites folder.

Final words: Met Models is a great photography site. Sure, it's not as big and doesn't have all the bells and whistles of its big sister Met-Art, but the content is just as good and it's more affordable. Met Models is a must-see for all those who like fine photography and beautiful women.